Partner dating friends britain
If you think that your partner is your everything, and you want to spend big swaths of your free time with that person, you may well demote some other people to the periphery of your life.
So I was intrigued when the BBC published a story that started with the sentence, "Falling in love comes at the cost of losing two close friends, a study says." Other journalists and pundits were also curious and weighed in.
I read it closely, wrote my review and sent it to the author, Robin Dunbar.I thought someone else had told me about it, too, but I've searched and re-searched both email accounts and can't seem to find that person.If you are the one, please let me know and I will add your name.] Good info and data, thanks.What Dunbar wants to know, though, is how the size of your inner circle changes when you become romantically involved.So the romantic partner is presumably replacing someone who was in your network previously.Not counting the romantic partner, then, coupled people have 4 people in their core social networks, compared to almost 6 for single people.Hence the BBC's claim that "falling in love comes at the cost of losing two close friends." Actually, Dunbar differentiated friends from family, and so if you want to be more specific, coupled people had one fewer friend and one fewer family member in their inner circle than singles did.First, the 540 people do not constitute any kind of representative national sample.Second, the single people and the people in romantic relationships were different people.The more compelling research strategy would follow the same people as they become involved in a serious romantic relationship and then continue to follow them as they stay in the relationship or transition out of it.So, how many people did the singles name as part of their core network (people they could turn to in a crisis)? If you count their partner, then they named 5 people as part of their inner circle - about 1 fewer than the singles named.